This page explores how often drawn numbers appear close together or in consecutive sequences. It helps us see whether number grouping occurs as expected in a random lottery environment.

Last 75 draws
From Mar. 5, 2025 To Nov. 19, 2025

Histogram of Number Clustering

The histogram of number clustering measures the typical spacing between consecutive numbers in lotto draws. Each bin represents a range of average gaps, showing whether numbers tend to cluster closely together or spread evenly across the draw. This histogram helps analysts detect patterns in number spacing, complementing other perspectives such as sums and ranges.

The histogram of average gaps between consecutive numbers in lotto draws reveals that the most frequent gap interval is 9-10 with 20 occurrences, suggesting a strong clustering in this interval. In contrast, the least frequent gap interval is 1-2 with 0 occurrences, showing it is rarely observed. This indicates a noticeable concentration of draws around certain gap intervals. Overall, the distribution shows clustering around specific gap intervals, indicating that draws tend to gravitate toward these values.

Format Changes in New York Lotto

The current format of New York Lotto is 6/59, which means, the players select 6 numbers from a pool of 1 to 59. During the draw, 6 main numbers and 1 bonus number are drawn from the same pool of numbers. But when New York Lotto was introduced in 1978, the format was different:

Period Format Bouns Ball
November 8, 1978 6/40 1 from the same pool of remaining numbers
May 22, 1983 6/44 1 from the same pool of remaining numbers
Nov 26, 1986 6/54 1 from the same pool of remaining numbers
Nov 27, 1999 6/59 1 from the same pool of remaining numbers

How New York Lotto Format Changes Affect Your Number Strategy.

The format changes have a direct impact on statistical analysis. Mixing frequency data across different formats is not advisable because each version of the game has a different number pool and probability structure.

For example, a number that appeared frequently in the 6/40 format may have done so due to higher individual draw probability, but that same frequency can be misleading in the 6/54 and 6/59 format.

Therefore, for meaningful analysis, it’s essential to treat each format as its own distinct dataset. Analyzing trends or frequencies should be restricted to results from within the same format period, especially if the goal is to inform number selection in the current game structure.