This chart shows the frequency of each lottery number based on selected specific number of draws. It helps players analyze number frequency trends and understand how often each number appears over time, detect frequency imbalances, and uncover potential patterns or biases that may influence lottery outcomes.
Number Frequency
The Number Frequency Statistics table below presents key metrics for analyzing the occurrence patterns of specific numbers. It covers 75 draws, from Feb. 19, 2026 7 PM to Mar. 28, 2026 12 AM.
It includes columns for Frequency, Expected Frequency, Last Draw Interval, and the Last Draw Date, which indicates the number of draws a ball appears regardless of their position, the number of draws since the ball last appeared, and the date the ball last appeared, respectively.
In Ohio Pick 5, each position in the winning number can contain any digit from 0 to 9. That means there are 10 possible digits, all with equal probability. Because each digit has the same chance of appearing, the theoretical probability for each digit is 1/10 or 10%. So if there are 375 digits from 75 draws with 5 digits, the expected frequency would roughly be ~37.5.
Although the actual numbers will not be perfectly equal because randomness naturally creates small fluctuations. However, over hundreds or thousands of draws, the distribution should gradually approach about 10% per digit. If one digit consistently appears far more or far less than expected, it could suggest a statistical anomaly or possible bias.
In the Number Frequency Chart above,the distribution is not perfectly uniform, indicating some variation across digits. The spread between the highest and lowest values is 17%. The distribution is noticeably uneven, which may indicate positional bias.
| Expected frequency: | 37.5 |
| Digits with higher-than-expected frequency: | 9, 0 |
| Digits with lower-than-expected frequency: | 3, 4 |
| Most frequent digit(s): | 9 at 48 |
| Least frequent digit(s): | 3, 4 at 31 |
This contrast between higher and lower digits suggests a skewed or uneven distribution pattern.
Number Frequency by Position
Not all positions behave the same. The Number Frequency by Position reveals how often each digit (0-9) appears in every draw position, helping uncover hidden patterns, frequency imbalances, and potential positional biases that may not be visible in overall results.
In every Number Frequency by Position, the expected frequency is 7.5 (10% of 75 draws) for each digit (0-9) in every position. Each position is independent, random, and can contain any digit from 0 to 9. That means there are 10% equally likely outcomes per position.
The distribution is not perfectly uniform, indicating some variation across digits.
| Expected frequency: | 7.5 |
| Digits with higher-than-expected frequency: | 0, 2, 3, 6 |
| Digits with lower-than-expected frequency: | 1, 5, 7, 8 |
| Most frequent digit(s): | 2, 6 at 10 |
| Least frequent digit(s): | 5, 8 at 5 |
The contrast between higher and lower digits suggests a skewed or uneven distribution pattern.
The distribution is not perfectly uniform, indicating some variation across digits.
| Expected frequency: | 7.5 |
| Digits with higher-than-expected frequency: | 6, 7, 9 |
| Digits with lower-than-expected frequency: | 1, 3, 5 |
| Most frequent digit(s): | 7 at 13 |
| Least frequent digit(s): | 1, 3, 5 at 4 |
The contrast between higher and lower digits suggests a skewed or uneven distribution pattern.
The distribution is not perfectly uniform, indicating some variation across digits.
| Expected frequency: | 7.5 |
| Digits with higher-than-expected frequency: | 0, 1, 4, 5 |
| Digits with lower-than-expected frequency: | 2, 6, 7, 8 |
| Most frequent digit(s): | 5 at 14 |
| Least frequent digit(s): | 6 at 3 |
The contrast between higher and lower digits suggests a skewed or uneven distribution pattern.
The distribution is not perfectly uniform, indicating some variation across digits.
| Expected frequency: | 7.5 |
| Digits with higher-than-expected frequency: | 0, 6, 8, 9 |
| Digits with lower-than-expected frequency: | 2, 3, 4 |
| Most frequent digit(s): | 6, 8 at 10 |
| Least frequent digit(s): | 2, 4 at 4 |
The contrast between higher and lower digits suggests a skewed or uneven distribution pattern.
The distribution is not perfectly uniform, indicating some variation across digits.
| Expected frequency: | 7.5 |
| Digits with higher-than-expected frequency: | 8, 9 |
| Digits with lower-than-expected frequency: | 1, 3, 4, 5 |
| Most frequent digit(s): | 9 at 14 |
| Least frequent digit(s): | 4 at 4 |
The contrast between higher and lower digits suggests a skewed or uneven distribution pattern.
The current dataset may be too limited to establish a reliable conclusion. Variations in digit frequency can occur naturally in small samples, and the observed distribution may not reflect long-term behavior. Increasing the number of analyzed draws will provide a more accurate assessment.